Archive for the ‘Sponsors’ Category

Thriving Amid Chaos

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011

Our Q4 newsletter is out and features the new White Paper “Thriving Amid Chaos.” While continuing to demonstrate leadership to your clients is important, you can simultaneously improve your business practices and weather the current economic and financial storm.

Thriving in today’s world relies on a two-pronged approach:

1) Inward-Looking: Control what you can – like how you manage your business – by looking at your 3Ps:

  • People
  • Planning
  • Processes

2) Client-Facing: Communicate more effectively by honing your communications strategy and making sure that your messages are:

  • Clear
  • Consistent
  • Convenient
  • Compelling

Click here to read the entire White Paper. Click here to see the newsletter.

Have a great rest of the quarter – and start thriving despite the chaos.

AK In The Press: Opinion Piece – Why The Bank/Brokerage Marriage Has Failed

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

My piece “Why the Bank/Brokerage Marriage Has Failed” appeared in today’s FundFire. To summarize – the bank/brokerage marriage experiment is a failure that has harmed reputations.

It’s hard enough to be an advisor these days, with the market just finishing its worst quarter since 2008; trying to manage your own business and reassure clients about their financial situation is difficult enough. But advisors at firms such as UBS and Bank of America/Merrill Lynch now have to answer questions about their parent as well.

In the wake of trading scandals at UBS and increased debit card fees at Bank of America, advisors have become “guilty by association,” suffering repetitional risk for things that have nothing to do with them.

But the strains in these relationships go deeper than today’s bad press. Cultural differences are another key reason for the disconnect that exists. The idea of cross-selling synergies created by the addition of a bank’s product lines seems appealing at first blush; the reality, however, is that most advisors will only sell these products on their own terms – they don’t want to be told what to do or coerced into selling anything.

These culture differences extend to compensation issues as well. Advisors are used to “eating what they kill.” This mentality has never really meshed with the more conservative mindset of bank management. While banks have for the most part been smart enough not to alter compensation structures significantly, the cultural disconnect and tension continue.

In fairness, some bank/brokerage marriages seem to be working somewhat better – such as at Wells Fargo Advisors – but in this case, the marriage is based on more of a quasi-independent advisor model. You still have to wonder, however, if the name itself will become a liability sometime in the future here, as it has elsewhere.

One could rightly argue that mismanagement and lack of oversight caused many of the problems that necessitated brokerage firms to seek capital to survive and resulted in these hook-ups. But differences between the cultures are often too great, and in retrospect, attempts to merge the two outfits probably should have been avoided. Perhaps the brokerage arms should have been allowed to remain operating as totally independent units from the start. This would have saved everyone involved a lot of grief.

AK in the News – Joining Forbes.com as Contributor to Advisor Network

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

I have joined Forbes.com as a contributing blogger in its Advisor Network. Please click to read today’s post: Is Your Client Cheating On You With Another Financial Advisor?.

Please take a look at my profile and sign-up to follow me and some of the other great professionals that contribute great articles of interest. I will be posting on a regular basis – let me know if there are specific areas of interest that you would like to see me write about.

How Many Other Advisors Do Your Clients Have?

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

Do you know?  And are you your client’s primary advisor? A recent survey of advisors and clients by Cerulli and Associates has some sobering results for many advisors. On the second question – of the 1500 advisors surveyed who concentrate on clients with more than $5 million in investible assets, 73% said that they were their client’s primary advisor while only 34% of the corresponding clients agreed with that assessment. Quite a disconnect.

Back to the question in the title – How many other advisors do your clients have? According to Cerulli’s report, which covered over 7800 households, about 25% of advice-seeking households use multiple advisors, with the percentage increasing to 33% among those with investible assets of $2 million to $5 million. That percentage grows to 58% for those with more than $5 million in investible assets.

Clients with multiple advisors also tend to keep less of their net worth with their primary advisor. By the end of last year, only 22.6% of investors surveyed kept more then 90% of their assets with their primary advisor; this percentage fell to 13% for those with more than $5 million.

All of the statistics quoted above showed gains from a similar survey conducted in 2008 – a continuing reaction to the financial crisis.

So, do you really know how many other advisors your clients have? The opportunity here is for those advisors who are able to focus on the entire relationship, even if they don’t have all of the assets. The advisor who plays this role is often referred to as the Alpha advisor (or quarterback). While it may be too late to stop your clients from diversifying among multiple advisors, providing the key service of reporting on all of their assets – whether for a fee or not – should position you above their other advisors. It’s also a great marketing and prospecting tool to help you grow your business and increase client retention.

It doesn’t’ seem that the trend toward multiple advisors is set to reverse itself, especially after the last few months, where images of 2008 are entering our dreams once again. So don’t fight the trend – react to it and succeed from it. Become an Alpha advisor.

 

DO YOU HAVE AN OPINION?

Friday, August 19th, 2011

It’s Bad – but it’s not 2008 bad.

Yes, it feels eerily like 2008. And yes, in a few short weeks, many of the stock market gains of the past three years have evaporated. But it is my opinion that as bad as it seems, we are in better overall shape than we were in 2008 – the credit markets are functioning and companies are in better financial shape than they were.

More about this later – but my point here is that this is my opinion. DO YOU HAVE AN OPINION? And if so, and you are client-facing, have you communicated this opinion to your clients? At times like this, clients want to hear from you.

Over the past few weeks, one of my clients has sent out three special notes to clients. One of these notes simply including a synopsis of the market commentary of a very well know market guru. Each time I received a communication from him, I felt a connection – that he was on top of his game. He is also calling clients to give the personal touch, but even if you do that today, that client still will want to know next week that you are still thinking about them.

Communicate with your clients – or they will not be your clients for long!

Back to the opinion portion of this post. Am I scared? Absolutely. My biggest fear is that politicians here and abroad (most notably Europe) are unprepared to deal with any crisis of this size. This is more a crisis of confidence than a meltdown of the system itself. And that is a good thing. We need our leaders to emerge with real ideas about cutting our deficits and kick-starting the economy. Because if we don’t, even though this is not 2008 again, things are not likely to improve for a long time.

Cutting Costs – The Right Way

Monday, August 8th, 2011

Global stock markets are in turmoil, confidence is eroding and layoffs are accelerating. That described the situation three years ago in the midst of the financial crisis. Add European debt problems, an increasingly dysfunctional government and continued high unemployment and you have today’s reality.

We don’t do special editions of our newsletter very often, but decided to issue one today.

Cost cutting has begun in many companies – and probably rightfully so. But there are right ways to cut costs and wrong ways. Our newsletter provides some perspective on this topic with the hope that rational cost cutting takes place – reductions that will truly position companies for future success.

Click here to read the full newsletter.

The Value of a Consultant – Part 2 – The Truth, The Whole Truth ….

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011

As we talked about a few weeks ago, in order for a consultant to truly add value, he or she must be able to:

  1. Provide an in-depth assessment and analysis of the business area(s) in question; AND
  2. Be able to provide not only a roadmap to solve the problems, but also be able to help implement the  solutions.

It is this second point where many consultants fall short. Top consultants are able to formulate a solutions roadmap that includes other solutions providers as appropriate and necessary. The larger the network of experts that a consultant has working relationships with, the better off clients typically are (recall the mention in our earlier post of the faculty of our partner firm Consult P3).

There is, however, another very important attribute that makes a consultant valuable. He/she must be willing to tell you the truth – to be brutally honest – whether or not you as the client are ready to hear it. There is a shared burden in this respect. As a client, you should only be willing to hire a consultant if you are receptive to getting an honest assessment and be willing to take constructive criticism. One of the most disheartening things you can ever do for your employees is hire a consultant, solicit feedback, get people excited that change is on the way, and then do nothing.

Likewise, if you are prepared to hear the good the bad and the ugly, you need to make sure that the consultant you hire is willing to do that. The best consultants know that their analyses might so infuriate the client to the point that there will be no future business. If a consultant is willing to be that truthful – to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth – then they may be the right consultant for you.

The consultant should of course be tactful as well – but you see the point. Hire a consultant only if you are ready and willing to hear the truth and make the necessary changes to improve your business.

 

The Value of a Consultant

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

Why do some people believe that consultants can help them, while others do not? The non-believers have probably had experiences with consultants that only assess their weaknesses; the believers, on the other hand, know that for a consultant to truly add value, he or she must be able to make recommendations and then assist with the implementation of the solutions.

Case in point was a recent prospect meeting. The CEO stated that they had a list of 16 recommendations for improvement from their last consultant, but that they had not had the time to address these recommendations, and further he didn’t feel that they had the knowledge to devise solutions themselves.

If a consultant can only come in and tell you what is wrong, yet not offer solutions to help you improve, then I would have to agree that the usefulness of that consultant is limited. After all, we all know that we can always find ways to do things better. The trick is being able to actually do something about it.

One way to evaluate a consultant is to consider who their strategic partners are – who helps them implement improvement plans for clients. In most cases, solutions will encompass hiring others to complement the strengths of the consultant. The article  Consultants Sell Success with Strategic Thinking & Teamwork was recently featured in allBusiness.

The article discusses how my partner Petey Parker and I work in our Consult P3 business partnership (Consult P3 complements the work that I do for financial services firms with firms from other industries). Our philosophy is based on assessment and solutions. Petey and I do the assessments and then work with our faculty of highly-qualifed partners who we recommend as appropriate to help clients improve their three Ps – People, Planning and Processes.

Next time you think of hiring a consultant, be sure to inquire about their implementation strategies. Oh yea, the answer for the prospect above. Step one would be an action plan to address the 16 points already identified and provide an implementable solutions roadmap. That would be something worth paying for!

 

On-Line and On-Point: A Guide to Social Media Success

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

Our newest White Paper – On-Line and On-point: A Guide to Social Media Success – has been posted on the Resources page of our website and included in our 3rd quarter newsletter. Click here to read the White Paper and click here to see the entire quarterly newsletter.

The White Paper specifically deals with how financial services practitioners and companies can develop a social media strategy. The benefits of a successful social media are two-fold – to stay top of mind with existing clients while developing and building new relationships.

Enjoy the White Paper – and start building your own social media strategy.

The Sad Story of Morgan Keegan

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

I spent almost eight years at Morgan Keegan and still have many friends who work there. So it saddens me to see what’s happening to the firm. Many will say that the sale to Regions Bank was the beginning of the end. While to some extent this may be true, what has led the firm to where it is today is greed – turning the other way and ignoring the unsustainable returns of the mutual funds that have now caused the firm so much trouble. If something seem to be good to be true…..

Now what happens? Probably one of two outcomes. Either the firm will be sold to a private equity firm or to another broker/dealer; insiders speculate that talks have been under way for awhile, and now that the “for sale” announcement has been made by Regions, it better happen fast or the advisors will start running for the doors.

The two inevitable losers from any sale – the home office staff and the City of Memphis. If a private equity firm buys the firm, you can bet that belts will be tightened and staff levels reduced. The same goes if the firm is bought by another broker/dealer – the odds of the home being in Memphis are pretty slim, and no one at Regions has the same loyalty to Memphis as Allen Morgan and his mostly long-retired gang.

For advisors, a sale to a private equity firm would be better; a sale to a wirehouse would result in a mass exodus, retention bonuses not withstanding. But even if Morgan Keegan remains quasi-independent, and is not melded into another broker/dealer, you have to wonder how far the firm is behind the competition now – certainly from a technology point of view – given the amount of money and time it has had to dedicate to the many lawsuits it has faced.

Yes, unfortunately, there are many losers. The dedicated home office that appears to be a loser under any scenario. The many advisors who didn’t sell a lot of the funds in question, have not been sued by clients, yet nonetheless have suffered from the reputational damage that has been done to the firm.

It saddens me that this is happening to this once great firm. Hopefully I will be proved wrong, and the end-result will not be a negative one for my friends at the firm.